Which exam board has the most relevant aural and tech work requirements? Which has the most music to choose from? Which system allows students to practise their sight-reading in the exam before being tested? Which has the shortest enrolment lead-times? Which exam board is the cheapest?
Answers in a minute, but before we begin, let’s find out what system everyone currently uses:
The opening questions were the basis of my online research this weekend after becoming frustrated with aspects of the AMEB system on which I was brought up and now prepare my own students for. So my first question is – do you still use the same exam system that you experienced as a child or have you ‘crossed over’?!
So, to the results. With Google at my fingertips, I put together a spreadsheet (Comparison of Piano Exams) comparing what I felt were important aspects of each system and the results were quite surprising. For example, I was sure that the 2.5 months lead-time that the AMEB needs to prepare each exam period had to be way longer than the others, but no, they are actually the shortest on average. Similarly, I was surprised to know that the AMEB’s repertoire list for each grade is substantially larger than any other exam syllabus – many of the others only offer 6-8 pieces maximum for each list at each grade.
By the way, please be aware that I only have exam experience with the AMEB so all the information in the attached spreadsheet I have gathered from online sources. There may be errors or omissions, so please do check things our yourself before you make any decisions about changing exam systems. If I’ve got something wrong, please let me know as I’m eager to learn more myself, but I certainly don’t make any claims that I’m an expert in this!
Here are my condensed findings:
- All boards except AMEB publish complete syllabi online (when is the AMEB going to catchup?) Here are the links to the others: Trinity ABRSM ANZCA
- None offer online enrolment (this still surprises me)
- The AMEB has the widest range of music choices at each grade level by far – I was very surprised at how limited some of them were.
- Exam costs are relatively similar across the boards
- If you’re looking for exams for piano ensembles, accompanying, duets, trios, etc. look at Trinity, ABRSM and ANZCA
- ABRSM seems to have the only official “Jazz Piano” stream grades 1 – 5
- Students can choose the order of their exam (eg. pieces, sight reading, technical work) in Trinity and ABRSM
- ABRSM doesn’t seem to test general knowledge in grade exams
- All except AMEB are starting to allow students to choose between various types or aural tests, technical work, etc. which I think is a great move forward.
- All except AMEB are offering improvising as part of aural tests in certain streams – brilliant idea!
- ANZCA and Trinity allow students to choose their own piece or play their own composition (as long as it meets certain criteria) in exams
- In Trinity and ABRSM, students can play during the sight-reading preparation phase before the examiner actually ‘listens’ and examines – makes sense to me!
- AMEB seems to have by far the most comprehensive technical work requirements, most of which have changed little since I did the exams 20 + years ago. This is in contrast to the Trinity and ABRSM boards who seem to be making significant changes to this part of their exams
- I like the practicality of the Trinity Aural tests – they seem to be much more relevant to good musicianship than the AMEB ones I’m used to which are very theoretical
- Trinity, ABRSM, ANZCA require only 3-4 pieces to be performed compared to 6 for higher level AMEB exams – not that I think this is necessarily a bad thing.
1. Love ‘em or hate ‘em, the AMEB is still the music exam standard in Australia and likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future. That said, I encourage teachers to explore other options if they believe that another method might be more developmentally and pedagogically sound.
2. ANZCA seems to have the most diverse offerings for students including “modern piano”, “piano for all occasions”, “digital piano”, ensembles, etc. but the level expected of each exam seems to be less than the AMEB equivalent standard.
3. Trinity looks like a more progressive version of the AMEB (consider recent changes to technical work in 2012 syllabus). But they still have very limited repertoire choices for candidates. Otherwise, these systems aren’t that dissimilar.
4. Strangely enough, given the importance given to AmusA and LmusA qualifications in Australia, they are still the cheapest diplomas of them all!
With all that said and done, I can’t look past the huge number of pieces offered for each level by the AMEB compared to all the others. It’s so important that students can choose pieces they enjoy playing for their exams; until the other exam boards can match AMEB in variety of repertoire offered, I think I have to put this feature in front of any improvements to sight-reading, aural or technical work for my students.Mind you, the AMEB still has a lot to learn from the other boards!
So which one is the best? Well, I guess that still comes down to your own opinion, but I hope the above information has been useful.
Since writing this article, I’m now aware of two other systems available in Australia (click to find out more):
I shall be doing more research on these in the coming months!
Latest posts by Tim Topham (see all)
- Teaching Rhythm in Pop Music - December 15, 2014
- How to distinguish yourself as a piano teacher in a competing marketplace | Tim Buckland - December 15, 2014
- See you at NCKP 2015! - December 14, 2014
- How good are your aural skills? - November 30, 2014